
The main image on the front cover is a long shot, presented very realistically. There are hardly any signs of post-production that make the image look superficial. The cover could have been made like this to reflect on the dramatic story of the film and to make it look as realistic as possible.
The image used not meant to have an edge or any movement to it. It looks very straight forward and gives a sense of realism. There is a big title for the film which stands out on the cover with other subtitles of other films and articles. There is a direct address however, no use of alliteration or play-on-words.
The title of the magazine is very bold and large in size which can link to King Kong as he is also of those same characteristics.
All the other subtitles are of the same font and colour but not size.
The composition of the magazine as a whole is very steady and settled as there are no flashes or any other picutres/objects on the cover apart from the main image and the subtitles.
This is in keeping with the genre of the film. Because conventionally the covers of magazines alwayz make a link to the film and make this obvious. This magazine cover does this very well.
The clour scheme of the magazine cover is yellow, white, gray and a bit of red. The placing of the subtitles are organised and easy to read and look at. The style of the magazine is clean cut! It is straight forward without any chaotic titles or flashes.
It is hard to see the brand identity of the film with other of its products as the poster of the film and other covers of magazines have King Kong on them while this one doesn't.




